Blog
Developmental, Line and Copy Editing: What Happens to Your Manuscript
Authors sometimes imagine editing as a single pass in which someone fixes typos. In practice, a novel goes through several rounds of work, and each round is looking for a different kind of problem. Knowing the sequence helps an author respond to feedback without feeling overwhelmed.
Stage one: the developmental edit
The developmental edit looks at the big picture. Does the story begin in the right place? Do the characters want something, and does that drive the plot? Is the pacing right, and are there scenes that could be cut or expanded? The editor typically writes an editorial letter of several pages, with notes in the manuscript. The author then revises, sometimes substantially, and this stage can be repeated if the changes are large.
Stage two: the line edit
Once the structure is settled, the line edit works at the level of the sentence. It improves clarity and rhythm, removes repetition, tightens dialogue and checks that the voice is consistent. A line editor does not change the story, but does look closely at how it is told. Authors often find this stage rewarding because they can see their own prose becoming sharper.
Stage three: the copyedit
The copyeditor checks grammar, spelling, punctuation and usage, and applies a style guide so that the manuscript is consistent. This is also the point where facts and continuity are examined: a character’s eye color, the day of the week, the distance between two towns, the date of a historical event. A style sheet records decisions such as how to spell an invented name, so that every later stage follows the same rules.
Stage four: the proofread
Proofreading takes place after the book has been laid out in its final pages. The proofreader compares the pages with the edited manuscript and looks for leftover errors: a missing word, a misplaced running head, a bad line break, a wrong page number. At this point the author should change only what is truly wrong, since every change has a cost and can create new errors.
How authors can prepare
- Keep a copy of every version and name files by date
- Read the editorial letter twice, a day apart, before responding
- Ask questions when you disagree; a good editor will explain
- Track your changes so the editor can see what you altered
- Keep to the schedule; delays at one stage move every later date
Working with feedback
Getting detailed criticism of your work can be uncomfortable. It helps to remember that the editor wants the same thing you do: a book that readers finish and recommend. Not every suggestion has to be followed as written, but each one points to a place where a reader stumbled. Sometimes the fix the editor proposes is not the best one, and the author finds a better solution to the same problem.
Why the sequence matters
Doing the stages in order saves time and money. There is no point polishing sentences in a chapter that will be cut, and there is no point proofreading a manuscript that will still be rewritten. Each stage narrows the focus, and at the end the text is clean enough to be printed with confidence.
Curious about how we treat the manuscripts we accept? Read about what we expect from authors, or browse the catalog to see the finished results.